NFU 'committed' to badger cull despite badger number concerns

THE NFU has stressed that it remains ‘committed’ to the badger cull despite concerns raised by a Defra survey revealing far higher badger numbers in the two cull areas than initially estimated.

But NFU president Peter Kendall has acknowledged that the cull organisers now face a ‘challenge’ to get the policy up and running this autumn.

Culling was expected to begin in at least one of the two pilot areas – West Gloucestershire and West Somerset – as early as the end of this week or early next week.

However, the publication by Defra of its survey of badger numbers in the cull areas has thrown a spanner in the works and prompted intense discussions over the past few days about whether it is feasible to start this autumn.

Responding to a Parliamentary Question from Shadow Defra Secretary Mary Creagh, Farming Minister David Heath revealed on Wednesday that the ‘best estimate’ for the number of badgers within each pilot area was 3,600 in West Gloucestershire and 4,300 in West Somerset.

This is double the number originally estimated in the West Gloucestershire area and about 60 per cent above the original West Somerset estimate.

The badger survey is central to the policy as it will determine how many badgers need to be culled to ensure the target of removing 70 per cent of badgers from the 300sq.km pilot cull areas is met.

A key question now is - given the substantial increase in the numbers of badgers that will have to be removed - whether the companies feel confident they can meet their targets with the resources they currently have at their disposal, which were based on much lower estimates of badger numbers.

Mr Kendall said on Friday: “We are working bloody hard to make sure this is deliverable. The latest numbers are making this more challenging but, before this starts, we have got to be very confident that we are going to deliver.”

The pilot culls are scheduled to last for six weeks and the timetable for an autumn cull was always going to be tight given the difficulties of culling once winter sets in.

Another potential complication is that the closed period for culling using cage traps starts on December 1, meaning the cull would have to start this weekend if cages are to be used alongside controlled shooting throughout the six-week period.

A Defra spokesman insisted there was ‘no change in badger cull policy’. “We are still absolutely committed to the pilot culls and we hope they will go ahead as soon as possible.”

He stressed that the pilot culls were examining the safety, efficiency and humaneness of controlled shooting, not caged trapping.

A Natural England spokeswoman confirmed on Friday that the agency was ‘still not in a position to issue the final licences’ as not all of the licence conditions had been met.    

There had been feverish speculation in the media on Thursday over whether the cull will be shelved until next year, sparked initially when senior Defra Ministers and officials cancelled a series of interviews with journalists about the cull, then reinforced by the concerns over the Defra badger survey figures.

Commenting on Thursday, NFU director of policy Martin Haworth said: “The survey figures of badger numbers released this week shows how serious the badger problem is in the South West and they emphasise the need to tackle the problem of bovine TB as soon as possible.

“The NFU and the government have both made it clear they are committed to carrying out badger control culls as part of its TB eradication package.”

He refuted the suggestion that NFU president Peter Kendall had said the cull was now ‘too expensive’ as a result of the extra workload.

Mrs Creagh said the ‘last minute wobble’ over the policy ‘has all the signs of another Government shambles’. “Labour has always said the badger cull was bad for taxpayers, bad for farmers and bad for wildlife. This incompetent Government should listen to the scientists and stop the cull,” she said.

Defra has today published the methodology that it used for estimating badger populations in the two areas on its website.

  • This story was updated on Friday afternoon.

Readers' comments (21)

  • thats it then, we have won, will paterson now have the decency to admit defeat publicly?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I understand the cull has to remove 70% or it could make the bovine TB problem worse. Also, it is not to go ahead unless Natural England is sure the funding is in place to achieve that 70% figure for 4 years. So, presumably, the participating farmers will now have to pay up more which could take some time? It is looking more and more as if the farmers involved have been sold a really disastrous policy by an incompetent government and an equally incompetent NFU. Now, shall we get serious about vaccination and dealing with the EU??

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • 2 counties invaded by the black and white rats if they were brown rentokil would have been deployed!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Well just goes to show how useless DEFRA really is. Between them and the NFU they couldn't organise a p**s-up in a brewery. This is just a feeble excuse to put off the cull for another year but I don't think farmers are going to put up with this.
    If the anti cull think they have won then they need to realise that this is not finished by a long shot.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Defra have not got a clue what they are doing. How can any sensible person have any faith in them.
    TIME TO STOP THE CULL NOW!!!!!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • 60% more badgers than originally thought, and mass interruption of shooting from members of the public taking peacefully to the footpaths in the late evenings. Who on earth could ever have thought this would actually work?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • So badgers numbers are so large that the protection order should be removed. EU countries have shoots during certain times of the year to reduce their numbers. This should now happen in this country.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • WON?????

    I seriously hope this is not the attitude of many of the anonymice here I began to write and 5 more comments of the same twisted nature field in soon after. This isn't a game, this is about fighting a disease that's spreading. Never lose sight of that. Cattle and badgers do not win until this disease has been erradicated. TB does not care for what rules we apply onto ourselves in order to hinder our fight against it, it just does what disease does.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This is the worrying thing Blake Jake....they still think this is a game when it quite clearly isn't. This has got to be sorted otherwise this disease is going to spread beyond our boundaries. This shouldn't have been held up just because there are MORE badgers than at first thought. They should have carried on this year taking the lower estimate and then they could have adjusted it later. The numbers are going to change anyway when the badgers produce young in January so this figure is going to keep on changing.

    2ladybugs

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • those who are against the cull certainly do not see this as a game! the issue is serious. the concern from anti cull is the government sweeping this dreadful disease under a badger carpet, instead of finding a long term effective solution. if they go ahead with the cull the vaccine will take longer the btb will return and no effort will be made to seriously tackle this ongoing disease. ireland culled and it returned within 6 years and farmers stated that it did not work. if the government detract from really working on a solution by thinking a cull is enough then, badgers, livestock and farmers livelihoods will always be threatened by this disease. the real goal here is to find a positive and effective way forward and for us all to work together and encourage the government from making real attempts at getting a vaccine through. it really is not a case of you verses me here.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 per page | 20 per page | 50 per page

Have your say

Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Register your email address for Farmers Guardian e-bulletins

Get the latest from Farmers Guardian delivered straight to your inbox. Click here to sign-up today

Already receiving bulletins? Sign-in to edit your preferences