Consultation launched on controversial pesticide rules

A CONSULTATION on how best to implement controversial EU rules on pesticides that could cost farmers between £13 million and £176 million, has been launched by Defra today (Tuesday, February 9).

Three overarching options to implement the European Directive on the Sustainable Use of Pesticides have been identified, each with a cost to industry.

  • Option 1 – Implementation of the minimum required by the Directive (cost to industry £13 million)
  • Option 2 – Improve and strengthen the current statutory and voluntary controls (cost to industry £32 million)
  • Option 3 – Adopt regulatory controls wherever possible (cost to industry £176 million)

The Directive, which must be implemented under EU law, covers areas including the training of pesticide users, inspection of spraying equipment and minimising the risk of pollution from pesticides.

It also covers access to information about pesticides used near homes, and how people could be given the option to obtain this information.

Environment Minister Dan Norris said whatever option was chosen, public health was the priority.

“I look forward to hearing people’s views on how we can build on the UK’s very high pesticide safety standards.

“We need a balanced approach to further reduce the risks and impacts of pesticides on people and the environment, while ensuring we can continue to grow high-quality affordable food to help feed a growing population.”

Initial reaction from industry has been for voluntary, rather than statutory measures. For instance if farmers were asked to notify residents before they used pesticides, rules should be based around a voluntary, not compulsory (and potentially costly and bureaucratic) framework.  

Georgina Downs of the UK Pesticide Campaign said it was vital the Government introduced compulsory measures, and accused Ministers of neglecting public health in its approach to pesticide regulation in the past.

She said: “It really is astonishing that Defra Ministers can say that public health is the Government’s priority when the Government has done nothing to introduce measures to protect human health and has fought tooth and nail against me in the courts for the last 6 years on the issue.

“Mandatory measures must be introduced to finally protect the health of residents and other members of the public from exposure to pesticides.

“These measures have to be at Governmental level from changes to its policy so that it is consistent for all rural residents across the country.”

She said the most important part of that should be to ban spraying around homes, schools, children’s playgrounds and other public areas.

The consultation, which has been launched by the Chemicals Regulation Directorate on behalf of Defra, runs until May 4.

To respond, contact Caroline Kennedy at EU Pesticides Consultation (Stage One), Room 214, Chemicals Regulation Directorate, Kings Pool, 3 Peasholme Green , York, YO1 7PX or email ConsultationCoordinator@hse.gsi.gov.uk.

Readers' comments (3)

  • voluntary measures seem to be working and i dont think that their is evedence to support any ill effects from spraying near houses, a good code of practice is in place and we farmers are doing our best to implement them. thanks

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • doing away with protective clothing, and suggests changing the chemical names to make them sound less dangerous!
    His tongue in cheek irresponsible article, "Don't simply spray it. say it" in the December British Farmer and Grower on the spraying issue illustrates PERFECTLY why mandatory not voluntary measures are essential. Read it and weep!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Alan, you stated "I don't think that their is evidence to support any ill effects from spraying near house"s...", I'm afraid that is not so.
    You mention.. “a good code of practice is in place and we farmers are doing our best to implement them...."
    I'm afraid doing your best isn't enough.

    The Green Code is breached frequently, there is no monitoring or come back when it is.

    A prominent NFU Council member, Guy Smith recently wrote about his ( and his father's) "cavalier” approach and attitude to spraying and drift in the past. He STILL thinks the issue is about "perception"and "communication", not risk; he advocates doing away with protective clothing, and suggests changing the chemical names to make them sound less dangerous!
    His tongue in cheek, irresponsible article, "Don't simply spray it. say it" in the December British Farmer and Grower on the spraying issue illustrates PERFECTLY why mandatory not voluntary measures are essential. Read it and weep!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory