Kendall lashes out at BBC over badger cull 'bias'

NFU president Peter Kendall has launched a furious attack on the BBC over what the union claims to be its ‘biased’, ‘inaccurate’ and ‘misleading’ coverage of the planned autumn badger culls.

Mr Kendall has written a letter of complaint to new BBC director general George Entwistle urging him to review the coverage, which he said was currently ‘clearly pitched against the cull’ and is helping to ‘ramp up the hysteria’ over the policy.

The letter was prompted by a lengthy feature on the planned culls on the flagship BBC2 Newsnight programme on Tuesday.

In it, Mr Kendall lists a catalogue of grievances about the feature, including the ‘disgraceful’ decision to grant anonymity to an anti-cull protestor who stated he would be taking direct action against the cull.

He said the decision suggested anti-cull protestors were being intimidated by farmers at a time when farmers, themselves, were feeling ‘harassed and intimidated’ by animal rights activists

“This suggestion is disgusting and clearly biased,” he wrote. “The BBC’s clear partiality in protecting the identity of someone whose clear intent is to disrupt a lawful process by himself taking illegal action goes against your own Editorial Guidelines and is shameful for an organisation which purports to be impartial, accurate and trusted.”

Mr Kendall also accused the programme of giving a misleading impression that a farmer who spoke of the ‘intimidation and harassment’ she had been subjected to was pulling out of the cull. Mr Kendall said this had subsequently proved to be ‘simply not true’.

He criticised the suggestion that the cull involved the ‘mass slaughter’ of badgers, claiming the phrase - ‘normally used to describe a barbaric genocide in a war zone’ - was llifted from the anti-cull lobby and clearly intended to ‘raise alarm and ramp up the hysteria’.

He said the Newsnight suggestion that 100,000 badgers could ultimately be culled was ‘extremely misleading’ as it suggested this related to the two pilot culls when it was, in fact, an upper limit over 10 years if the policy was rolled out over 40 areas  

The NFU president said the Newsnight feature was ‘symptomatic of the BBC’s general biased coverage of the cull’ across its formats, although he singled Countryfile out as a notable exception of a BBC programme that covered the debate in an ‘impartial’ manner.

He described the corporation’s reporting of the science behind the cull, notably on its website, as ‘inaccurate, out of date and one-sided’, with too much weight given to scientists who opposed the policy, such as Lord Krebs, and not enough to those who back the cull.  

“As the cull rolls out, tensions will be heightened and intimidation of farmers will escalate from some animal rights organisations. The BBC has a duty to base its reports on the latest most accurate science and facts and not to lend tacit support to the anti-cull movement,” he told Mr Entwistle.

A BBC spokewoman said: “The information supplied in this piece came from respected organisations involved in both sides of this story. We will deal with any complaint as and when it is received, responding directly to the NFU.”

She said the BBC considers all requests for anonymity very carefully and that the protestor requested anonymity as he was concerned he would be targeted.

“Due to the emotive nature of this story it would be a plausible concern for both sides. Newsnight would have afforded anonymity to the other contributors had they requested it. Hearing from this individual, although anonymously, meant we could challenge their position and plans for direct action,” she said.

Readers' comments (20)

  • Well said Peter Kendall. The BBC is time and again both inaccurate and misleading when covering this subject.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Indeed - well said,

    It's time the BBC gave mass prime time coverage to the likes of Dr Ruth Watkins, microbiologist [warmwell, September 20th 2012 ~ "Unfortunately no one wants to hear what microbiologists have to say..."
    Dr Ruth Watkins, shocked to hear Simon King talk of the "70% efficacy of the BCG vaccine for badgers" and then declare vaccinating them would be "job done",] and the writers of

    instead of making such a reality show of celebrity opinions with no understanding of the FACTS.

    Unfortunately FACTS don't make a good fairy story which is what the viewing public seem to expect now from the dumbed down BBC.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Just watching the episode, the presenter is nearly more biased than the RSPCA and Bill.
    This is ridiculous

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Chive.

    @ m james.

    The only field trials currently available state that vaccination of badgers, which are believed to be uninfected prior to vaccination, results in a 74% reduction in the number of badgers with detectable infection when compared to non-vaccinated badgers.

    It is the same vaccine (BCG) that is used to provide humans with protection against tuberculosis, being 70-80% effective. In both populations it is not necessary for all individuals to become immune before infection can no longer sustain itself.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Chive,
    Please actually READ Dr Watkins email and then follow with
    Sunday, September 23, 2012
    How much is enough?

    I'm sick of putting info on here and the same comments and questions arising which show the info has not been read/understood.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Peter Kendall really doesn't like the truth does he?
    I watched this - it was informative and I enjoyed it very much. It's not the BBC's fault that Bill Oddie and the RSPCA chappie came across rather well. Also not the BBC's fault that the NFU felt the need to resort to melodramatic images of farmers weeping uncontrollibly in their kitchens, and the chosen govt representative appeared ill-informed and pompous.
    Leave the BBC and the badgers alone

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The Peasant
    Are you sure Anonymous | 27 September 2012 6:10 pm, that you know what the truth is? There is good reason to believe Bill Oddie and the RSPCA chappie were the ones that were ill-informed and pompous. Read the report by the Farm Crisis Network entitled "Stress and Loss." Farmers weeping in their kitchens are reality. Those who need to resort to melodramatic images are the people invoking images of trigger-happy hooligans roaming the countryside intent on shooting every last nice cuddly badger
    in the UK.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Too much emotion and not enough detail ,but that is tabloid telly for you.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Saviour?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • So in this "democracy" that you are all ranting about, where 100,000 of 66,000,000 claim that they are a majority, a Celeb who is used to appearing on TV and is at home speaking there, has more clout than an individual fighting to protect those who feed the rest of you?

    Talk about biting the hand that feeds!

    Well said Peter Kendall I say!


    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 per page | 20 per page

Have your say

Register your email address for Farmers Guardian e-bulletins

Get the latest from Farmers Guardian delivered straight to your inbox. Click here to sign-up today

Already receiving bulletins? Sign-in to edit your preferences