SPS 2010 payments ‘could be delayed’ by RPA mapping errors

THE Rural Payments Agency’s botched Rural Land Registry (RLR) mapping project could delay the delivery of 2010 Single Payments, the Defra-commissioned review of the agency has warned.

The review team did not examine the project in detail but concluded on the basis of what it saw that it was not ‘well planned or well executed’.

It noted the ‘significant criticism’ of the project from the farming industry over the production of ‘inaccurate or unrecognisable maps, particularly around boundaries and land parcel numbering’.

It said fears this could ‘derail’ 2009 SPS payments proved unfounded but warned there is ‘now evidence to suggest there will delayed effect into the 2010 claim year with risks to payment dates’. 

“It is possible that the combined effect of the RLR delays and errors on the 2010 claim year and Natural England’s ELS re-launch will result in a number of problems for farmers and both organisations in 2010,” the report said.

The review predicted the agency was likely to receive more complaints over the course of the 2010 claim year about the ‘uncertainty’ surrounding the maps and their ‘perceived or actual accuracy’.

Questioned on the claim, an RPA spokeswoman said the agency was ‘on target’ to meet its goals for SPS 2010 but admitted it will be ‘tough’ in light of the RLR update.

She reiterated the agency’s aim to ‘make as many payments as possible, in full, as early as possible in the payment window’. 

“For 2009/10, RPA had a target of making 75 per cent of payments by 31 January.  The target for 2010/11 is for 85 per cent of customers to have been paid by December 31st 2010, and RPA is on target to deliver this although it will be tough following major upgrades to the land register and improving data accuracy,” she said.

Industry reaction to RPA review

“The NFU hopes that its publication and the Government response marks the beginning of getting the RPA to a place where it can hold its head high as an effective and cost-efficient organisation. Absolutely crucial to this, however, is Defra taking responsibility for the agency and ensuring that an effective action plan is drawn up and, more importantly, kept to.”

NFU president Peter Kendall

“This damning criticism of the RPA is long overdue and only confirms what farmers and land managers have known for a long time. We welcome the Review and particularly Jim Paice’s pledge to personally drive forward progress at the RPA by chairing a new Oversight Board.”

Country Land and Business Association president William Worsley

“Our concern is that with Tony Cooper gone, the RPA is going to be rudderless. We are sad Tony Cooper he is going. Given the legacy of the SPS system and the RPA structures and management he inherited, he was doing a good job.”

Tenant Farmers Association chief executive George Dunn

Readers' comments (2)

  • Its all very well blaming RPA for the mess of SFP, but isnt the real culprit of this mess, Margaret Beckett and the useless Labour Government.
    The pathetic Minister should be brought to a justice over her stint in charge of matters
    concerning Agriculture.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The Labour style was to force the issue - Gordo sold the gold (losing us £4bn) against all advice. Beckett forced through a system which asks the RPA to strike matches on jelly, and then waltzes off in her caravan. We need a political system which makes our elected leaders responsible and accountable, even when voted out of office. Maybe they would listen a bit harder to the practical arguments.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory

Farmers Guardian newsletters

Get the best of Farmers Guardian delivered straight to your inbox. Click here to sign-up today