Campaigners step up fight against proposed pig farm
CAMPAIGNERS have stepped up their fight against plans to develop a pig farm with the capacity to hold 25,000 animals.
More than 6,500 people have signed a petition to stop Midland Pig Producers (MPP) building the farm on 12.5ha (30 acres) of land in Derbyshire.
They are asking Derbyshire County Council to refuse the proposals for various reasons including its close proximity to Foston Hall women’s prison, the risk of air and water pollution, the odour, its effects on small local producers and its ‘negative impact’ on property values.
Anti-factory farming group Pig Business also raised concerns over animal welfare and said the pigs would most likely be fed with antibiotics which would ‘spawn the growth of drug-resistant bacteria such as MRSA ST398’, a new disease which passes from pigs to humans.
The group’s director Tracy Worcester said: “Cheap pork is flooding UK supermarket shelves from mainland Europe where, according to Compassion in World Farming (CIWF), 90 per cent of the farms are not obeying European Union animal welfare legislation.
“Instead of trying to compete with these cheap imports by building mega farms with a few small improvements in terms of animal welfare and green credentials, our Government should be ensuring our small-scale family farms receive payments that reflect their benefits to society.”
The group has also received support from Friends of the Earth, the Soil Association, Change.org and actor Dominic West.
Change.org’s sustainable food editor Sarah Parsons said the farm would open the door for more factory farms in the UK.
If approved, it would become the third-largest factory farm in the UK, housing more than 25,000 pigs and sending more than 1,000 to slaughter every week.
As FG reported last month, MPP hit back at objectors’ claims saying most statements were ‘completely untrue’.
A spokesman said the unit would be fitted with new technology which meant it would not be accompanied with a bad smell and animal welfare was a priority.
He said size had no impact on disease which would be controlled by good standards of hygiene, welfare and management systems.
The council is expected to make its decision by the end of the summer.
Farmers Guardian newsletters
Get the best of Farmers Guardian delivered straight to your inbox. Click here to sign-up today
-
General news and breaking news alerts
Minimum weekly delivery -
Livestock, arable, dairy and young farmers
news and features
Monthly delivery



By unlocking the export potential China offers the pig industry, not to mention the red meat sector as a whole, we could gain entry into a marketplace which comprises a fifth of the world’s population.
Readers' comments (4)
Anonymous | 14 July 2011 11:42 am
The location of this huge proposed intensive pig farm has been misjudged. The prison and the proposed site will be fed by a single access road which leads off the regularly blocked A50 trunk road. If there is an emergency at the new site (eg methane explosion) the emergency services may not get access. This development will add at least 5000 HGV's to the already crowded local roads. with ZERO benefit to the community. 18 people to look after 30,000 pigs and a power station. 24/7 ..........doesn't need a brain sugeon to spot the risks.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
anatoliy strembitskyy | 14 July 2011 12:10 pm
Is it possible to know the name of official spokesman for MPP. Also would be interesting to know why Farmers Gurdian refer to Pig Business director by name Tracy Worcester, and anonymously refer to MPP's person as spokesman. As long as his name remains anonymous he can safely deny all the facts thrown at him, but once his name is mentioned every time in the media he will more visible. Please name the MPP spokesperson
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
anatoliy strembitskyy | 14 July 2011 1:51 pm
I have no reason to believe in what MPP is preaching, until the day they start naming their official spokesperson; so we can publicly challenge her or his statements. Maybe MPP's spokesperson could explain publicly why The Environment Agency has objected their plan to build the pig farm near Foston
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Hazel Pollard | 14 July 2011 2:12 pm
We would all like to know why the EA objected. The SSAFO Regulations 2010 are apparently not enough - they should explain themselves. As far as I can see, there is no limit to the size of a slurry lagoon, or to building it over an aquifer, provided there is compliance with these regulations.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment